Skip to main content

You must be a logged-in member of UHMS or a subscriber to the UHMS Journal in order to download the articles listed within these pages. If you are a member or subscriber, please log in using the Log In button above. If you would like to purchase a membership or a subscription, use the buttons below.

Search UHM/UBR

Spirometry and oxidative stress after rebreather diving in warm water

Introduction: Hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) therapy and use of enriched air can result in oxidative injury affecting the brain, lungs and eyes. HBO2 exposure during diving can lead to a decrease in respiratory parameters. However, the possible effects of acute exposure to oxygen-enriched diving on subsequent spiro- metric performance and oxidative state in humans have not been recently described recently. We aim to investigate possible effects of acute (i) hyperbaric and (ii) hyperbaric hyperoxic exposure using scuba or closed-circuit rebreather (CCR) on subsequent spirometry and to assess the role of oxidative state after hyperoxic diving.

Methods: Spirometry and urine samples were obtained from six well-trained divers (males, mean ± SD, age: 43.33 ± 9.16 years; weight: 79.00 ± 4.90 kg; height: 1.77 ± 0.07 meters) before (CTRL) and after a dive breathing air, and after a dive using CCR (PO2 1.4). In the crossover design (two dives separated by six hours) each subject performed a 20-minute session of light underwater exercise at a depth of 15 meters in warm water (31-32°C). We measured urinary 8-isoprostane and 8-OH- 2-deoxyguanosine evaluating lipid and DNA oxidative damages.

Results: Different breathing conditions (air vs. CCR) did not significantly affect spirometry. A significant increase of 8-OH-dG (1.85 ± 0.66 vs. 4.35 ± 2.12; P < 0.05) and 8-isoprostane (1.35 ± 0.20 vs. 2.59 ± 0.61; P < 0.05) levels after CCR dive with respect to the CTRL was observed. Subjects didn’t have any ill effects during diving.

Conclusions: Subjects using CCR showed elevated oxidative stress, but this did not correlate with a reduction in pulmonary function.

DOI: 10.22462/03.04.2018.6